Ayodhya Dispute: Supreme Court postponed the hearing date till January
Ayodhya Dispute: Supreme Court postponed the hearing date till January
New Delhi: The trial of the Ayodhya case hanging over the years took place in the Supreme Court today and once again the apex court deferred the matter till January. The case was challenged in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Allahabad High Court in Ayodhya in 2010, eight years ago in the judgment on the ownership of land.
What is the court decision?
The bench of three judges, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, in the Supreme Court on Ayodhya dispute, deferred the matter till January. Today, as soon as Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi appeared before the bench, the Chief Justice said that the matter should be brought before the appropriate bench in January. After today's remarks of the Supreme Court it became clear that the day-to-day hearings will take more time now.
The date of regular hearing will now be decided in January after the Supreme Court has upheld the Ayodhya ground dispute till January. Although it is not decided whether this bench will hear or the new bench will be formed and whether the bench will decide further proceedings there.
 |
| Supreme Court |
What is the reaction of the Supreme Court verdict?
Ravi Shankar Prasad
 |
| Ravi Shankar Prasad |
BJP Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said, "We will not raise the Ram temple issue during the election.. We have full faith in the court and we respect the court. Many people expect to hear from as soon as possible. In Allahabad, I was the lawyer of Ramlala. We live here and the decision comes from our right. Hindus got place in place of Ramlala Sirajman. Now those who had to go to the Supreme Court went there. Being a law minister, I cannot say anything more on this issue."
Asaduddin Owaisi
 |
| Asaduddin Owaisi |
On hearing, AIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi said, "The Chief Justice's Bench said that in January it will decide who will get a case with the appropriate bench. The court's decision that will have to be considered. The country will run only by the Constitution. Apart from this, Owaisi said that the court will not give the decision on the basis of trust, It is a matter of "Title Suit". The people who are threatening to leave Mosque. Those person is our enemy, I want to tell that we are going to leave that place. The Supreme Court give the decision of that verdict.Owaisi said that the government brought the ordinance and how long will it scare away from such things. The country will run from the constitution that will be run by manners. If they have 56-inch chest, then pass the Ordinance."
Keshav Prasad Maurya, deputy CM of Uttar Pradesh
 |
| Keshav Prasad Maurya |
On the hearing of the Ayodhya case till January,Keshav Prasad Maurya said, "I do not want to comment on this as it is the decision of the Supreme Court. A good message does not go through the hearing. "
Sunni Waqf board
 |
| Sunni Waqf Board |
The Sunni Waqf Board has expressed disappointment once again on the Ayodhya verdict in the Supreme Court. The Sunni Waqf Board says that she was convinced that the country's biggest court will not wait any longer in this case and will hear the matter on a daily basis and settle the matter at the earliest.
Imran Babu Khan, former chairman of the UP Bar Council
 |
| UP Bar Council |
According to the Waqf Board member and former UP chairman of the Council Barrister Imran Babu Khan, the verdict came in the right of anyone, but the hearing should now be completed as soon as possible. According to them, this case cannot be waited anymore, because it not only has the feelings of millions of people connected, but also the danger of the country's peace. Imran Mabood Khan said that this time the hearings have survived due to the Central Government. It was always an allegation that the Waqf Board was postponing the trial, but this time it was not so.
What is Ayodhya dispute?
 |
| Babri Masjid |
Land dispute in Ayodhya has been going on for seventy years, the Ayodhya dispute has been a major issue of tension between both the Hindu and Muslim community. Ayodhya is believed to be a Ram temple on the disputed land. It is believed that Lord Rama was born on the disputed land itself. Hindus claim that the Ram temple was demolished and the mosque was formed.
It is claimed that in 1530 Babar's army chief Mir Baqi had demolished the mosque and built the mosque. In the 90's, the political atmosphere of the country was hot on the Ram temple issue. On December 6, 1992 in Ayodhya, many people had dropped the disputed structure of Babri Masjid.
What was the decision of the High Court in the Ayodhya dispute?
 |
| Ayodhya |
After the dismantling of the disputed structure in Ayodhya, there was a criminal case against the owner of the land. Eight years ago the Allahabad High Court gave a historic verdict The High Court decides to distribute 2.77 acres of disputed land equally in three parts.
The first part of Ram Murti was found by Ram Lala Vishajaman. The second part of Ram Chabutra and Sita kitchen was found in the Nirmohi Akhara. The third part of the land was decided to give Sunni Waqf board. The Hindu and Muslim parties challenged the High Court's decision in the Supreme Court. The three sides have challenged their claim to the entire disputed land.
Want to read more latest news, please click on the given link.
Ayodhya Dispute: Supreme Court postponed the hearing date till January
Reviewed by INDIAN POLITICS
on
October 29, 2018
Rating:
Reviewed by INDIAN POLITICS
on
October 29, 2018
Rating:
No comments: